- 2020.01.18 16:03 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Greg Troxel
-
2020.01.18 21:32 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.18 22:29 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Roger Leigh
-
2020.01.19 02:05 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.19 11:51 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Even Rouault
-
2020.01.19 15:13 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Greg Troxel
-
2020.01.19 15:54 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by ZdPo Ster
-
2020.01.19 16:53 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Roger Leigh
- 2020.01.19 19:41 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.19 16:53 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Roger Leigh
-
2020.01.19 15:54 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by ZdPo Ster
-
2020.01.19 15:13 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Greg Troxel
-
2020.01.19 11:51 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Even Rouault
-
2020.01.25 16:22 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.25 20:24 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.26 16:37 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Jeff McKenna
- 2020.01.26 16:39 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Jeff McKenna
- 2020.01.26 17:34 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Miguel Medalha
-
2020.01.26 16:37 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Jeff McKenna
-
2020.01.25 20:24 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.19 02:05 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2020.01.22 12:25 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Miguel Medalha
- 2020.01.29 14:14 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2020.01.18 22:29 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Roger Leigh
- 2020.01.19 17:32 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Miguel Medalha
2020.01.19 11:51 "Re: [Tiff] Warnings while building tools", by Even Rouault
We should not get rid of it because the CMake build is a "self serving" build which makes the assumption that the user is using the build product as is.
That's a reasonable one, isn't it? All other projects I can think of make the same assumption, and that applies to the autoconf build as well. If the user wants do embed libtiff directly in their application and bypass libtiff.so/dll or do anything custom, they're on their own.
The Makefiles produced by CMake can not be independently used, and they even need CMake available to work.
That's expected for a CMake build. CMake is pretty much mainstream to build a large number of open source projects on Windows. Not really a very exotic requirement in my opinion.
I'd be much in favor in dropping the nmake build as well. libtiff doesn't need 3 build systems IMHO.
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com