-
1999.06.04 03:45 "Re: Large File Support", by Frank Warmerdam
-
1999.06.07 13:00 "Re: Large File Support", by Rainer Wiesenfarth
- 1999.06.07 13:03 "Re: Large File Support", by Frank Warmerdam
- 1999.06.08 21:14 "Re: Large File Support", by Peter Smith
-
1999.06.07 13:00 "Re: Large File Support", by Rainer Wiesenfarth
- 1999.06.04 07:32 "Re: Large File Support", by Rob Tillaart
- 1999.06.04 18:35 "RE: Large File Support", by Bruce Forsberg
- 1999.06.10 09:48 "Re: Large File Support", by Klaus Bartz
- 1999.06.10 15:10 "Re: Large File Support", by Peter Smith
- 1999.06.14 11:16 "Re: Large File Support", by Martin Bailey
1999.06.09 14:08 "RE: Large File Support", by Ed Grissom
Of course, keeping essentially the same model with modest changes in the format to support larger numbers should go a long way to satisfying that objective.
As far as I can tell, here are the necessary changes:
++++++++++++++++start of changes++++++++++++++++++++++
Initial file bytes changes:
- TIFF magic number changes from "42" to "84" (double 42 ??)
- Initial IFD offset is 8 bytes instead of 4
- Next IFD offset at the end of a block of tags will have to be 8-bytes instead of 4.
New Data Type definitions:
LONG64 - A 64 bit unsigned integer
SLONG64 - A 64 bit signed integer"
Tag Definition:
A tag is now made up of 16 bytes, the last field is 8 bytes long, and either contains the data (if it will fit in 8 bytes), or an 8 byte pointer to the location of the data.
Redefinition of Existing Tags:
All tags that currently require a 4 byte pointer to data will use an 8 byte pointer in the new format.
++++++++++++++end of changes++++++++++++++++++++++++
The data offset tags (stripoffsets, tileoffsets) will _have_ to contain 8-byte pointers. Other TAGs that use offsets ( resolution, bits/sample/band ) will almost certainly have to use 8-byte pointers also, since we cannot guarantee the location that this data will be stored at.
I don't see how we can put an 8-byte pointer in _some_ TAGs without changing the size of all TAGs. Since we are redefining the size of a TAG structure, I would not say that the changes are modest.
As far as contacting Adobe, I tried a variety of email addresses, but the only one that responded was the "mail customer support" link on the www.adobe.com web site. I don't think it was on the main page, but somewhere under customer support.
Unfortunately, the response I got was a canned message to call the 1-800 number.
--
ed grissom
egrissom@ziimaging.com