2014.12.15 17:49 "[Tiff] Unnecessary bigger JPEG-compressed TIFF", by Even Rouault
- 2014.12.15 19:53 "Re: [Tiff] Unnecessary bigger JPEG-compressed TIFF", by Joris Van Damme
- 2014.12.20 22:51 "Re: [Tiff] Unnecessary bigger JPEG-compressed TIFF", by Bob Friesenhahn
2014.12.20 22:51 "Re: [Tiff] Unnecessary bigger JPEG-compressed TIFF", by Bob Friesenhahn
Have you compared JPEG-compressed TIFF output sizes with original JPEG files?
Perhaps GraphicsMagick (and ImageMagick) are doing something wrong, but TIFF with JPEG compression is looking a *lot* larger than original JPEG files:
freddy:~% gm convert seaworld.jpg -quality 90 crap.tiff
freddy:~% ls -l seaworld.jpg crap.tiff
-rw-r--r-- 1 bfriesen home 939868 Dec 20 16:45 crap.tiff
-r--r--r-- 1 bfriesen home 208903 Jun 12 2008 seaworld.jpg
Even using one strip per image makes little difference.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/