AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2004.08.25 19:36 "[Tiff] GDAL Unofficial Private TIFF Tags", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.08.25 22:52 "Re: [Tiff] GDAL Unofficial Private TIFF Tags", by Joris
2004.08.25 23:48 "Re: [Tiff] GDAL Unofficial Private TIFF Tags", by Chris Cox
2004.08.26 00:18 "Re: [Tiff] GDAL Unofficial Private TIFF Tags", by Joris
2004.08.26 01:19 "Re: [Tiff] GDAL Unofficial Private TIFF Tags", by Chris Cox
2004.08.28 01:37 "[Tiff] JBIG and JPEG2000", by Joris
2004.08.29 02:34 "[Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Joris
2004.08.29 04:48 "Re: [Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.08.29 10:26 "Re: [Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Joris
2004.08.29 19:50 "Re: [Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.08.29 20:04 "Re: [Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.08.30 17:29 "Re: [Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Joris
2004.08.30 18:30 "Re: [Tiff] tif_fd and error handling", by Andrey Kiselev

2004.08.25 23:48 "Re: [Tiff] GDAL Unofficial Private TIFF Tags", by Chris Cox

Frank wrote:

I would like to stress again that these have not been allocated

Frank,

Thank you very much, that is nice clean excellent documentation, leaving me with no work other then cutting and pasting.

My personal opinion on the non-registered issue is that

  1. The tag reference exists in order to document. Tags being not registered, does not deminish the need to document them.
  2. In fact, tags being not registered, yields the possibility of conflict, sooner or later, and that is in fact an additional reason to document them so that others will try to avoid them, and so that we can sort things out should problems ever arise.

And if the tags don't conflict, and they provide contact information -- we might still be able to register them...

Chris