2000.08.10 22:06 "RowsPerStrip -- tiffdump vs. TIFFGetField", by Mccarty
Michael J
Thread
2000.08.11 14:41 "Re: RowsPerStrip -- tiffdump vs. TIFFGetField", by Andreas R. Kleinert
> That better should be "rb".
libtiff automatially assumes TIFF files are binary. This is handled in the platform specific open functions, such as TIFFOpen() in tif_unix.c or tif_win32.c. It isn't necessary for applications to provide the binary flag to TIFFOpen().
Hm. He didn't say, which one he's using. I for example use my own since years.
>> TIFFGetField( in, TIFFTAG_ROWSPERSTRIP, &rps );
>
> Checking "in" for being != NULL and checking
> the return value of TIFFGetField() would be a good idea.The point of a minimal demonstration program is to show the behaviour in question with the minimum amount of error checking, and other unrelated code getting in the way.
Well, it more looked like a (quote) <snippet>.
Andreas_Kleinert@t-online.de | http://www.ar-kleinert.de |
Freelance Consultant & Writer | Software Engineering |
*** PerSuaSiVe SoftWorX *** | x86 Win/Linux, 68k/PPC Amiga and more |
Already signed http://petition.eurolinux.org against SWPAT?