AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2010.06.17 15:39 "[Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 16:21 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.17 16:22 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.17 16:38 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 22:06 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.18 00:13 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 13:44 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.17 16:28 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 16:34 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 16:55 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 17:15 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 18:04 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.17 18:09 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.17 18:47 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 19:35 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.18 00:33 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 01:45 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 01:54 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.18 02:00 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode
2010.06.18 13:32 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Edward Lam
2010.06.18 13:54 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Olivier Paquet
2010.06.18 02:36 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.17 20:14 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Tom Lane
2010.06.17 20:35 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2010.06.18 00:31 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode

2010.06.18 00:13 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4 API/ABI stability?", by Adam Goode

On 06/17/2010 06:06 PM, Edward Lam wrote:

Sorry, I think that I'm wrong on this. It does look like tif_win32.c is the default. On the note of tif_unix.c for Windows, I think we only need to patch it _lseeki64 to work for large files?

It is the default if you use Makefile.vc. If you use the standard configure and make (like with MinGW), then tif_unix.c is used. And yes, it looks like _lseeki64 is all that is needed here. Though in that case, you don't get mmap on Windows.

I could put together a patch to the autotools stuff to pick tif_win32.c on Windows. Then we just need to fix bug 1941.

Adam