2009.02.25 08:01 "[Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by
-
2009.02.25 09:45 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by
-
2009.02.27 00:56 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by S Carlsen
-
2009.02.27 01:53 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by
-
2009.02.27 03:07 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by Chris Cox
- 2009.02.27 05:02 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by Toby Thain
- 2009.02.27 17:41 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by Edward Lam
-
2009.02.27 03:07 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by Chris Cox
-
2009.02.27 01:53 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by
-
2009.02.27 00:56 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by S Carlsen
- 2009.02.25 14:06 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by Toby Thain
2009.02.27 18:30 "Re: [Tiff] OT: Text layer possible in tiff format?", by S Carlsen
I would say "both." Start from a clean, well-thought-out, TIFF-ish architecture -- one that is powerful enough to represent the graphics and text constructs that are found in a PSD/PSB file. (And more.)
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Toby Thain <toby@telegraphics.com.au>wrote:
So, for those who want to design equivalent add-ons to TIFF, do they start with a clean slate, or do they try to align their efforts with a mangled, incomplete 79-page codex?