AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2012.07.29 19:51 "[Tiff] What about hiding not-officially-exported functions?", by Tom Lane
2012.07.30 12:40 "Re: [Tiff] What about hiding not-officially-exported functions?", by Jay Berkenbilt
2012.07.30 23:45 "Re: [Tiff] What about hiding not-officially-exported functions?", by Tom Lane
2012.07.31 01:04 "Re: [Tiff] What about hiding not-officially-exported functions?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2012.07.31 13:54 "Re: [Tiff] What about hiding not-officially-exported functions?", by Edward Lam

2012.07.31 01:04 "Re: [Tiff] What about hiding not-officially-exported functions?", by Bob Friesenhahn

Given this, I'm not going to risk sneaking a symbol filter into Red Hat's 4.0 release. I think we should consider adding one at the next major library release, though.

It does sound risky. Meanwhile I am looking into fixing the issue where the OpenGL and GLUT configury is introducing some of their requirements into libtiff if those components are found.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/