2022.12.09 15:48 "[Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Even Rouault
- 2022.12.09 18:03 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Kurt Schwehr
- 2022.12.10 13:29 "Re: [Tiff] [gdal-dev] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Kai Pastor, DG0YT
-
2022.12.11 12:22 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Christoph Gohlke
-
2022.12.11 16:37 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2022.12.11 16:57 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Even Rouault
-
2022.12.11 20:34 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Sulau
-
2022.12.11 20:43 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2022.12.11 21:04 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Even Rouault
-
2022.12.11 22:34 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Christoph Gohlke
- 2022.12.12 18:31 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Even Rouault
-
2022.12.11 22:34 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Christoph Gohlke
-
2022.12.11 21:04 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Even Rouault
- 2022.12.11 22:08 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Christoph Gohlke
-
2022.12.11 20:43 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2022.12.11 16:37 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Bob Friesenhahn
2022.12.10 20:02 "Re: [Tiff] [gdal-dev] libtiff v4.5.0 release candidate available", by Even Rouault
Probably nitpick, but isn't CMake convention to call the last component "patch" instead of "micro"? I think the latter's Autotools only.
This #define is not aimed at matching the naming convention of a particular build system (but indeed as this logic is driven by our autoconf system, it inherits a bit from it). I can see other software (Poppler, libKML) having similar #define using MICRO.
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.