- 2016.07.05 13:39 "Re: [Tiff] git version control", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2016.08.20 17:28 "Re: [Tiff] 32 bits per sample", by
-
2016.08.20 04:15 "[Tiff] 32 bits per sample", by
- 2016.08.20 08:05 "Re: [Tiff] 32 bits per sample", by Roger Leigh
- 2016.08.20 11:46 "Re: [Tiff] 32 bits per sample", by John
- 2016.08.20 14:45 "Re: [Tiff] 32 bits per sample", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2016.08.20 04:15 "[Tiff] 32 bits per sample", by
2016.07.05 13:39 "Re: [Tiff] git version control", by Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, rleigh@codelibre.net wrote:
Revisiting this thread from December 2012 http://www.asmail.be/msg0054798531.html
Is migrating from CVS to git still on the cards? I'd be happy to volunteer to repeat the conversion for the current state of the CVS repository--I've done it for several projects and I'd be happy to dust off my skills and do this for libtiff as well.
A volunteer has already been maintaining a Git mirror on github. If we switch to Git, we would surely start with this mirror.
To echo some of the sentiments in that thread, I think that a modern system like git would make the project much more accessible for others to contribute to. Speaking for myself, previously a heavy CVS user in the late '90s-mid 2000s, I've replaced CVS with git for nearly a decade now, and even I find it a struggle to use after using modern VCSes.
My own Git skills are not great (they are polished with Mercurial) but definitely a distributed changeset-oriented VCS would be of significant benefit to the project.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/