2021.01.15 23:32 "[Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Kurt Schwehr
-
2021.01.16 01:12 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Edward Lam
-
2021.01.16 14:56 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2021.01.17 06:49 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by William Bader
- 2021.01.17 07:33 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Tom Lane
-
2021.01.17 06:49 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by William Bader
-
2021.01.16 14:56 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Bob Friesenhahn
2021.01.17 06:49 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by William Bader
Is ssize_t guaranteed to hold negative values other than -1?
Is intmax_t a better option than intptr_t? Back in 16 bit 8086 MSDOS days, you could have small model code with 16 bit pointers but 32 bit longs.
[If it matters, the c99-require-stdtypes branch built cleanly on my Fedora 32 x86_64 laptop (except for some gcc warnings about implicit-fallthroughs in case statements) and all 94 tests passed.]