AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2021.01.15 23:32 "[Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Kurt Schwehr
2021.01.16 01:12 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Edward Lam
2021.01.16 14:56 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Bob Friesenhahn
2021.01.17 06:49 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by William Bader
2021.01.17 07:33 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Tom Lane
2021.01.17 17:43 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Kurt Schwehr
2021.01.18 14:32 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Edward Lam
2021.01.19 17:21 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Kurt Schwehr
2021.01.19 18:57 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Bob Friesenhahn
2021.01.20 20:41 "[Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by Thomas Bernard
2021.01.21 15:01 "[Tiff] MR 151 (was: Re: MergeRequest for discussion code style)", by Edward Lam

2021.01.17 06:49 "Re: [Tiff] MergeRequest for discussion code style", by William Bader

Is ssize_t guaranteed to hold negative values other than -1?

Is intmax_t a better option than intptr_t? Back in 16 bit 8086 MSDOS days, you could have small model code with 16 bit pointers but 32 bit longs.

[If it matters, the c99-require-stdtypes branch built cleanly on my Fedora 32 x86_64 laptop (except for some gcc warnings about implicit-fallthroughs in case statements) and all 94 tests passed.]