2021.04.16 17:46 "[Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
-
2021.04.16 17:48 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Even Rouault
- 2021.04.16 17:59 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
-
2021.04.16 21:05 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
-
2021.04.16 21:37 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
-
2021.04.16 21:41 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Even Rouault
-
2021.04.16 22:23 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
- 2021.04.16 22:28 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Even Rouault
-
2021.04.16 22:23 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
-
2021.04.16 21:41 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Even Rouault
-
2021.04.16 21:37 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
2021.04.16 23:08 "Re: [Tiff] tiffcp: LERC codec options refer to zstd even if zstd support is not present", by Miguel Medalha
> It happens that there is another 'Lerc_c_api.h' under ' lerc\include'. This is different > and this is the one containing the definition you point to. Do they need to be different?
Under V.2.2.1 these files are identical. Was this an oversight?