2008.11.01 07:10 "[Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Brad Hards
-
2008.11.14 08:14 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Brad Hards
-
2008.11.14 16:18 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2008.11.14 23:32 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Brad Hards
-
2008.11.16 00:39 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2008.12.13 10:30 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Brad Hards
- 2008.12.13 15:18 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2008.12.13 16:35 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2008.12.13 10:30 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Brad Hards
-
2008.11.16 00:39 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2008.11.14 23:32 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Brad Hards
- 2008.11.14 16:53 "RE: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by ComSquare Martin Osieka
-
2008.11.14 16:18 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Frank Warmerdam
2008.12.14 05:47 "Re: [Tiff] example of (standalone) TIFFRegisterCODEC", by Bob Friesenhahn
The reason why I included that statement is that a non-trivial amount of the header file is actually from tiffio.h. The copyright on tiffio.h is as shown.
Then it is reasonable.
The other way to deal with this (actually, just avoid the issue) is to include all the new code in existing files. Would that be preferable for licensing or technical reasons?
It does not really avoid the issue but I think that new interfaces are best put in new files.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/