AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2001.10.05 22:22 "16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Dwight Kelly
2001.10.06 14:32 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Martí_Maria
2001.10.08 13:32 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Bill Radcliffe
2001.10.09 00:12 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Martí_Maria
2001.10.25 21:53 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.26 13:28 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Martí_Maria
2001.10.26 12:46 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.26 19:32 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Martí_Maria
2001.10.26 14:26 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Dwight Kelly
2001.10.26 20:54 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Martí_Maria
2001.10.26 15:45 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.26 14:35 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.26 18:28 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Joris Van Damme

2001.10.26 18:28 "Re: 16-bit ICC L*a*b* ?", by Joris Van Damme

For anyone interested and for the sake of the archive...

Marti and I were able to conclude that there are defenetly two different encodings of 16bit/channel lab, both being photometric=8. There is no possible way of determining which is which from code.

I do not know what application brewed this single test image. Marti's interpretation of 16bit/channel lab is defenetly the prefered one, since that encoding seems most frequent.

Joris