2021.01.04 14:23 "[Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Even Rouault
- 2021.01.04 14:55 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Edward Lam
- 2021.01.04 18:43 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Greg Troxel
- 2021.01.05 17:01 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Jeff Breidenbach
- 2021.01.05 20:29 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Kurt Schwehr
- 2021.01.05 20:46 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Kemp Watson
-
2021.01.06 04:45 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by William Bader
- 2021.01.06 10:40 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Even Rouault
- 2021.01.06 14:15 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2021.01.10 12:12 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Even Rouault
- 2021.01.10 14:54 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2021.01.10 16:27 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Roger Leigh
- 2021.01.15 15:58 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Even Rouault
2021.01.04 19:04 "Re: [Tiff] Motions related to C99 use in libtiff", by Greg Troxel
I see your point. Just realize thought that this is asking packagers to choose between
- not updating tiff
- patching everything that depends on tiff
- dropping tiff as a dependency for things where that is sane (maybe emacs)
- dropping things that depend on tiff and things that depend on them
I'm going to choose not updating tiff until the pain is pushed around and the other packages that depend on it (the ones that matter) have been updated.