-
2004.10.01 16:41 "[Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Ian Ameline
-
2004.10.01 16:53 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2004.10.01 17:01 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.10.01 17:19 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Steve Carlsen
- 2004.10.01 17:27 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Losinger
-
2004.10.01 17:48 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.10.01 17:50 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2004.10.01 18:03 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Losinger
-
2004.10.01 22:22 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
-
2004.10.02 01:21 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.10.02 01:45 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2004.10.02 03:43 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
-
2004.10.02 04:10 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.10.02 04:41 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2004.10.02 04:53 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
- 2004.10.02 10:28 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
-
2004.10.02 04:10 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.10.02 01:21 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.10.01 22:22 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Chris Cox
-
2004.10.01 16:53 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2004.10.02 10:20 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
- 2004.10.04 11:29 "[Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Rob van den Tillaart
- 2004.10.04 16:50 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Steve Carlsen
- 2004.10.04 18:30 "RE: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bill Bither
- 2004.10.04 18:49 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
- 2004.10.04 18:59 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2004.10.02 01:45 "Re: [Tiff] Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
uncommon for applications to not be able to foresee future incompatible versions of file formats, users do know that, and expect Photoshop 4.0 to eg not know what a DNG file extension means. That is merely logical, no user expect up to date behaviour from an outdated version.
GraphicsMagick would attempt to read the DNG file like a normal TIFF file and obtain poor results. Extensions are almost meaningless except for as a hint since responsible readers look at the file header instead (if they can). Users are usually illogical when something doesn't work. Most users won't know what BigTIFF is.
I feel the primary issue is: Is BigTIFF a new version? Or is it a new file format? Let's decide, and be consistent, is what I propose. Do you plan to write
Since no existing standard TIFF reader can read BigTIFF, it must be a new file format.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen