-
2004.10.01 13:34 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2004.10.01 13:49 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.10.01 13:57 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2004.10.01 14:17 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.10.01 14:24 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2004.10.01 14:56 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2004.10.02 14:16 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Andrey Kiselev
-
2004.10.01 14:17 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Joris Van Damme
-
2004.10.01 13:57 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2004.10.01 13:49 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Joris Van Damme
- 2004.10.03 16:01 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.10.01 14:56 "Re: [Tiff] quad-tile", by Bob Friesenhahn
Ah, I was toying with the same idea. Seeing I can contribute so little C (let alone makefiles ;-)), perhaps this way I can ease Andrey's workload? If not, perhaps I can at least contribute a suggestion: a HTML index into the testimage, explaining what is what, and what is valid, and including tag dumps (and maybe even a reference thumbnail in a HTML-friendly and independent format like PNG) could increase the usefullness of a testimage suite tremendously.
Reference thumbnails would useful if someone knew how to read *all* the images. :-)
Not all TIFF images are meant for human consumption or look like a normal image.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen