Thread

2005.03.17 10:47 "[Tiff] Photoshop Masked area TIFF images", by

2005.03.17 20:13 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop Masked area TIFF images", by Chris Cox

2005.03.17 21:58 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop Masked area TIFF images", by Pascal Peuch

2005.03.17 22:49 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop Masked area TIFF images", by Bob Friesenhahn

2005.03.17 23:34 "[Tiff] Re: Tiff file with Transparency mask (former 'Photoshop Masked area TIFF images')", by Pascal Peuch

2005.03.17 23:44 "Re: [Tiff] Re: Tiff file with Transparency mask (former 'Photoshop Masked area TIFF images')", by Bob Friesenhahn

2005.03.18 22:17 "Re: [Tiff] Re: Tiff file with Transparency mask (former 'Photoshop Masked area TIFF images')", by Pascal Peuch

2005.03.17 23:53 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop Masked area TIFF images", by Chris Cox

2005.03.18 22:23 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop Masked area TIFF images", by Pascal Peuch

2005.03.18 22:17 "Re: [Tiff] Re: Tiff file with Transparency mask (former 'Photoshop Masked area TIFF images')", by Pascal Peuch

I would add that, according to the standard, though PhotometricInterpretationTag specific value [4] is in the scope of the baseline, baseline readers are not supposed to read more than the first IFD (but they are supposed not to crash).

I'll send you such a file next week.

Thanks