- 2009.10.06 23:19 "Re: [Tiff] SourceForge terms changes, heads up", by Graeme Gill
-
2009.10.07 20:11 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Eskandar Ensafi
- 2009.10.07 19:25 "[Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Eskandar Ensafi
- 2009.10.07 20:24 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Toby Thain
- 2009.10.07 21:26 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2009.10.08 15:09 "Re: [Tiff] SourceForge terms changes, heads up", by Ron
2009.10.07 19:59 "Re: [Tiff] Wrong Native Bit Order on Intel x86_64", by Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Eskandar Ensafi wrote:
I noticed that when I tried to compile tiff-4.0.0-beta4, the native bit order on 64-bit x86_64 systems was
> determined to be FILLORDER_MSB2LSB (not correct as far as I know) whereas on 32-bit x86 systems, it is
> correctly determined to be FILLORDER_LSB2MSB. checked my current tiff-3.8.2 installation (the standard package provided in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4), and the same discrepancy existed in tiff-3.8. I >
This is very interesting. It seems like there should be some
efficient way to determine this at run-time rather than via the
configure script. I am not sure how to test for native fill order
though.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/