AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2017.11.30 15:44 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by
2017.11.30 13:52 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2017.11.30 14:04 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by Even Rouault
2017.11.30 10:31 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by Roger Leigh
2017.11.30 13:22 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by Olivier Paquet
2017.11.30 14:00 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by
2017.11.30 15:26 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2017.11.30 15:57 "[Tiff] [DONE] Switching to gitlab !", by Even Rouault
2017.11.30 16:14 "Re: [Tiff] [DONE] Switching to gitlab !", by Even Rouault
2017.11.30 17:36 "Re: [Tiff] [DONE] Switching to gitlab !", by Roger Leigh

2017.11.30 15:26 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by Bob Friesenhahn

On jeudi 30 novembre 2017 07:52:52 CET Bob Friesenhahn wrote:

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Even Rouault wrote:

>>> Have we acted the switch to the gitlab repository?

>>> I'm +1
>>

>> Web page automated refresh has not been switched yet.

So I assume this is a +1 from you too? (we should have some more formal decission making process. Perhaps something in the line of https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc)

Yes, you already effectively had a +1 from me.

I think that

any future development commits should be to Gitlab. One final commit

>> should be made to CVS to document that the content there is now

> frozen.

I was thinking to just decomission the CVS repository (have to find out how to do that exctly), or rename it to some libtiff_historical name. That way, people won't pull from a deprecated repo

The repository itself does contain some other useful historical things besides libtiff such as a version of libjpeg which supports multiple depths in the same build. It would be wrong to just turn off the server.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/