AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2012.02.18 22:46 "[Tiff] libtiff 4.0.1 and 3.9.6 released", by Bob Friesenhahn
2012.02.22 12:45 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4.0.1 and 3.9.6 released", by Jay Berkenbilt
2012.03.27 23:20 "Re: [Tiff] Question about TAG_BITSPERSAMPLE", by Steve McKinney
2012.03.27 22:15 "[Tiff] Question about TAG_BITSPERSAMPLE", by Steve McKinney
2012.03.27 23:02 "Re: [Tiff] Question about TAG_BITSPERSAMPLE", by Bob Friesenhahn
2012.03.27 23:28 "Re: [Tiff] Question about TAG_BITSPERSAMPLE", by Bob Friesenhahn
2012.03.28 00:44 "Re: [Tiff] Question about TAG_BITSPERSAMPLE", by Daniel McCoy

2012.03.28 00:44 "Re: [Tiff] Question about TAG_BITSPERSAMPLE", by Daniel McCoy

From Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>, Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 06:28:07PM -0500:

Thanks for the speedy response. I can work around the lack of support for differing sample sizes, just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something before proceeding.

I am not sure why this decision was made (I would not have made it) but TIFF files with uneven sample sizes are exceedingly rare since hardly any software is able to read such files.

It's worth remembering that this decision was originally made for libtiff more than 20 years ago when computers where much slower and memory was much harder to come by. The decision probably seemed much more reasonable in that climate.

Daniel McCoy - Pixar