2020.12.22 13:59 "[Tiff] Naming of the 'libtiff' libraries in Windows -
proposal", by Miguel Medalha
Thread
2020.12.22 13:59 "[Tiff] Naming of the 'libtiff' libraries in Windows -
proposal", by Miguel Medalha
2020.12.22 16:44 "Re: [Tiff] Naming of the 'libtiff' libraries in Windows -
proposal", by Edward Lam
2020.12.23 15:43 "Re: [Tiff] Naming of the 'libtiff' libraries in Windows -
proposal", by Edward Lam
2020.12.22 18:07 "Re: [Tiff] Naming of the 'libtiff' libraries in Windows - proposal", by Miguel Medalha
I understand your reasoning and you are most probably right. As for the static version of the library, I still think it would be a worthwhile insertion. The building of other projects needs a static version of the tiff library, and as it is the dynamic library is overwritten by the static library when built with 'cmake -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF’. This insertion would enable the coexistence of both libraries inside the same directory.
if(MSVC)
set(CMAKE_STATIC_LIBRARY_SUFFIX "-static.lib")
endif(MSVC)
Resulting in 'tiff-static.lib'.
What do you think?