Thread

2001.10.03 19:05 "OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Scott Marovich

2001.10.04 22:42 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tim Bell

2001.10.05 02:21 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme

2001.10.05 03:16 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Niles Ritter

2001.10.05 13:00 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Leonard Rosenthol

2001.10.05 18:58 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme

2001.10.05 19:43 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Leonard Rosenthol

2001.10.05 19:44 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme

2001.10.08 02:54 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Graeme Gill

2001.10.05 17:00 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tore Bostrup

2001.10.05 17:46 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme

2001.10.05 18:50 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tore Bostrup

2001.10.05 18:54 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme

2001.10.05 21:21 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Ross Finlayson

2001.12.02 16:28 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Jon Saxton

2001.12.02 22:30 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tom Lane

2001.10.08 02:54 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Graeme Gill

It is NOT a proprietary format - it is a completely open and publicly documented specification. It can even be extended and enhanced (and subsetted) such as in the PDF/X specifictions (http://www.cgats.org). Therefore, it is NOT proprietary.

Apart from the patents.

Graeme Gill.